According to modern science, the last will of murdered person is always to kill the murderer in self defence.
Homo Sapiens are wired through their neural network coprocessors in the brain grown from code in DNA passed to us from ancestors to posess self preservation instincts.
So if you scan the brain of any person being aware of them being murdered by a murderer, you will find out that they want to save their life at the cost of the murserer's life. It is pretty well understood primitive biological function of the primal brain we all share.
It is only because the murderer did not gave the victim the chance to execute their self defence rights that we will setup a justice system and execute it in their name as retribution. We will mourn and more as restitution.
Such is the logic of reality, believe me ;]
Having said this, if you want to be like Jesus, you can forgive by default in all cases.
In order to understand physics of objective reality which we all share and occupy, one needs to understand what it is made of at the basic level, before embarking on the next steps explaining time, matter, energy and space. It will be much more difficult if one does not start at the beginning.
Reality is the ever-changing three-state object.
To define reality as we all share it, at minimum we need an object which can freely change its state between three options available to it and no end to the changes between the three states. With the above two assumptions, the object produces what we all are and share.
To define reality in scientific terms you need to assume:
0. Logic, to assume in the first place. One will need a circle to define zero, therefore logic of reality is recurrent because one needs infinityto define logic. Pi is half-infinity as it has no end, but one needs infinity to define half of it.
1. Three distinct states, let us call these Yes, No and Maybe for the sake of communication.
2. Infinite force of free change between these 3 states, ‘free’ meaning all states can change to any of the other state. Yes can change to No or Maybe, No can change to Yes or Maybe, Maybe can change to Yes or No. ‘Infinite’ meaning without end nor beginning.
The two assumptions together create reality.
Continuous space is the effect of infinite change.
Reality object holds no prejudices about its materiality. It only has three states but its change does not end.
According to mathematics of Albert Einstein, on whose never disproven giant shoulders this definition of reality is built, we all share continuous three dimensional space and the illusion of time as change of this 3d space. His theory explains time direction as direction of change from the source to observer. Definition of reality as three state object which can change ad infinitum is what binds his and quantum theory of his friend Niels Bohr together.
According to the definition applied to general relativity by Einstein, time is the illusion caused by relation of the order of informationreceived about distant change from infinite directions in a point of view.
Space is continuous but change is distinct. Change is atomic but space can divide indefinitely. Time is both atomic and continuous as it is the affect of atomic change in continuous space.
Time is the effect of change and does not exist on its own. Time is a relation between objects, not an object. Time is different for every point of continuous space. There is no time travel possible, but one can affect the rate of change locally.
Three states is quantifiable, but infinity of change is what makes reality rich.
Vacuum is lack of change in space.
This theory predicts that we are in the base reality which is expanding.
This theory predicts there is no Planck length, just this three state object which is forced by will to change. The result of division by zero does not exist in reality, because it cannot be defined by three state logic. Reality object cannot perform division by zero but it can indefinitely divide by two.
There is no other way to realise liberal goals than to lie, steal and cheat.
Please ask the question “does goal justify the means” to your extremely liberal friends and watch the set in. Huge laughs, typically.
Income tax is a good example of lie about stealing which liberals use to further their goals.
Another funny one is when they lie about National Socialism being far right rather than far left.
You can keep your plan, you can keep your doctor. True or false, what difference does it make?